This book, by Mr. Andrew J. Hirschl, of the Chicago bar, is full of the information which has been gained by actual practice in and out of the courts and is intensely practical. Though we are somewhat shocked at times at the boldness of some of its suggestions, yet, when examined from the author's standpoint, which is that of the client's interest which is regarded as affected by either that of an unjust attack, or some wrong he feels it necessary to have remedied by process of law, we are constrained to agree with him. Everyone has a right to a fair trial even though his attorney may think him to be in the wrong. It frequently turns out that a lawyer finds that he has been mistaken in the belief that his client may be the wrongdoer. It has been shown that parties have confessed to wrongful acts, of which, afterwards, other parties have been clearly shown to have been guilty. The book abounds in practical suggestions for the young practitioner and good advice as to the personal conduct of the lawyer in and out of court. For instance, on page 57 the author says, as to the advocate's attitude before a jury: "The jury as a rule, like fair play. Fairness is by all odds the strongest position to assume in the course of any litigation and of course that involves being gentlemanly and tolerant and patient. It is better to be too tolerant than not tolerant enough, to avoid being the offender. The case should be conducted properly, within the bounds of law and in a gentlemanly manner, then if the opponent is differently constituted, if he is unfair, provokes discussion, makes jeering remarks, the jury will soon become prejudiced against him and turn their sympathies the other way. The time comes when they will see that one man is being imposed upon, that the other man's insulting remarks are wrong and unfair, and when a favorable opportunity comes, he can be crushed with one effective response. A double end is thus gained. The antagonist has been overcome and the sympathy of the jury has been retained. A much wiser and stronger course than to follow him in his petty bickerings as some lawyers do; to bicker back and return sneer for sneer, while both contestants belittle themselves before the jury." This is good advice, for, it is too often the case that young lawyers get wrong notions of the proper attitude to assume before a jury. We have all seen the man described in the above quotation. He is often the development of assumption, and of course, is not then natural. A man never loses by being a gentleman anywhere, but there is no place where it tells with more benefit than in a court room. It is a virtue that had best be assumed if one has it not. It will be found of great value to the young lawyer and a profit to all to read. -The Central Law Journal, Vol. 63 [1906]