Baseball team organizationWhat happened with the A team ?One basketball A-team workload was sufficiently heavy to make task interdependence necessary and their performance outcomes ( i.e. grades) were important to individual's academic standing ( i.e. they were probation consequences for low team grades) and job prospects ( for both recruitment and tuition reimbursement). Thus, when there were student teams, the work were a reasonable simulation of business teams with both task related work as well as social relationship and reputation consequences if the groups failed.The fact that the A-team was newly forming and began their work with the same baseline resources was also important to this study in terms of differentiating the effectiveness of team conflict management strategies. Although A-team who have different expertise, but they have conflict due to different educational background and working experiences to cause A-team members cooperation will be more difficultly.Why did the group process break down?This group process broke down because every member have different educational background and working experiences in their expertise field. They did not discuss who could do this team leader clearly For example, Aran suggested he could attempt to do this A-team leader because he was a management consultant in one large firm and his age was 52 year older than other four members, but the four members who could not agree his suggestion because they also had their expertise educational background and working experience. It should cause diversity conflict between of them. So, this group could not continue to discuss successfully.What dimensions of diversity were responsible for the conflict?Diversity is often defined in terms of particular dimensions, most commonly gender, race, and ethnicity, Other important dimensions also exist. These include age, social class, sexual orientation, personality, functional experience ( e.g., finance, marketing, accounting), and geographical background. Visible attributable ( e.g. race, gender, ethnicity), attributes directly related to job performance (e.g. education and functional experience), and rare attributes are the most likely to be seen as important. Workplace diversity could be a valuable asset for a organizational growth and development, e.g. age discrimination, not equal employment opportunity. Everyone has an equal chance at employment regardless of race, sex, religion, national original. suggestion of solvable method: