Would you, my reader, not agree with me that an accessory to the murder is a murderer himself? In plain words, if you know about a crime in the making and you do not stop it or call crime stoppers to inform them about the crime you are an accessory to the murderer. In my opinion, the Saudi Foreign Minister, SFM, for short, is exactly one of those murderers in the case of Journalist Jamal Khashoggi. The Saudi Consulate in Istanbul falls under his auspices and the Consul General, Mohammad Al-Otaibi, reports to him through the Ambassador in Ankara in Turkey which is the line of reporting. My theory of the incident is that if the Consul finds himself bombarded by two plane-fulls of operatives, he surely must have reported it to his boss and his boss would follow the chain of reporting and so on. unless they were all involved in the murder of Khashoggi, this is the reasonable thing that should have happened. if this had happened, the logical thing for the MFA could have stopped the whole tragedy by a phone call to his counterpart in Turkey or to the Turkish Government itself alerting them that a tragedy was in the making. This did not happen and for the MFA to say that the operation went wrong would mean that he knew about it- A CULPRIT OR ACCESSORY TO MURDER- and was sure that a crime was taking place on the premises which he ought to be supervising through his representatives and delegates in the Consulate. I must say that as every member of the team, he has blood on his hands and so does the Consul, Al-Otaibi and other members of the team. Each of them is equally a murderer of Khashoggi and must be treated towards the same end of Khashoggi, i.e. beheading. While I was working in the Arabian Gulf countries and culminated my years of work in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, I used to hear by my own ears and see by my own eyes large numbers of the mistreated maids and laborers from the poor Asian countries flocking to their countries' embassies seeking refuge and repatriation to their countries as they could not take it any more in these Gulf countries as they were often humiliated, beaten, mistreated and denied payment for month and months. That is what an embassy of a country would be supposed to do to its citizens, a refuge place, not a butchery of human beings and citizens of the country as what happened for the late, Journalist Jamal Khashoggi.As you are going to be reading about this gruesome incident in the following pages, I must say that while the majority believe that the Saudi Crown Prince, Mohammad Bin Salman was behind the atrocious, unimaginable, brutal, inhuman, despicable grotesque incident that does not have a description in the books. this is because the circle around him was involved almost in its totality which would give the world a definitive opinion that MBS was the one who gave the orders on the pretext that the late Khashoggi may have been one of his critics, which for some makes his murder attributable to MBS. Perhaps, I am in a different aisle and stand in the opposite side of where the majority is and would say that, in my modest opinion, MBS was not involved, nor was he the one who ordered the killing and this is what we have to explore in this brief write-up.incidentally, I was recently reading about the Argentinian submarine which rested on the sea bed at 950 water depth a year or more ago and never came up with 44 persons on board. I said to myself that these guys must have started to eat the flesh of their colleagues when they started to lose hope of a swift recovery hoping that the survivors would eventually be rescued but this did not happen. there an exigent case that they may have started to eat their fellow colleagues' flesh when the y lost hope and reached a stage of insanity, which might have happened. there is a difference here between a premeditated murder of Journalist Khashoggi and these poor submarine sailors who could not make it up to the surface. The only similarity