This book is a hard look at the reality of the modern-day existence of an undiscovered Sapient, who's existence, always shrouded in mystery, does exist, a sapient being that predates humankind. This fact-based accounting of a relationship developed between a scientist who reveals the nature of one Sasquatch. Located in Minnesota close to the location described in the book JW Burchick tells the world "In an attempt to develop a story line close to the actual home of one Sasquatch in particular.

Since discovering and documenting the level of intelligence of the surviving ancient man, his findings about the species required trust between them. Upon discovery he publishes what he has learned in his communication with the being. His finding about this gentle giant of the woods, rivals that of neanderthal, especially when compared to average man. Surprised by what he learns from and about him, armed with the results of his ability to communicate with the Sapientman, he reveals to us what the species wants from humans.
The book is a balancing act on paper. A balance sought between fiction and nonfiction. The story is inspired by actual events that occurred in recent times. Readers say this book is bombshell evidence dropped into a skeptical bunker.

The difficulty in writing a book under the auspicious of "real life fiction" is the overarching belief of the reader viewing the story as fictional. I went through the process of connecting thousands of dots in the construction, personal experience and data to develop a "script worthy story" from factual elements gathered from eyewitnesses, historical accounts and interviews. My stories are mostly based upon interviews of people who do not wish to be identified and or from accounts made public via social media. Upon contacting these people through social media, their stories were more complex and truthfully consistent than I first suspected.

Why not call it non-fiction then? Several reasons come to mind. First, while the reports that I have painstakingly outlined are, in my opinion, truthful, although I was not there to witness the evidence myself, the witnesses believe what they have experienced to be true. Secondarily, witnesses can only provide seconds, and sometimes minutes of accounts of encounters and piecing together a feature length story from minimal information is difficult at best. I found it interesting that accounts of interactions are a mosaic of similarities, which when viewed from ten thousand feet all have the same embodiment of truth, therefore making them easily molded into a factual credible story line for reader enjoyment.

I believe much of what is seen on social media is contrived, but there are those accounts that are credible and cannot be ignored. The problem is the frustration I've seen from people who aren't given the information they wish to establish a "reason to believe." Even to believe in what others are reporting is problematic for them, mostly because their frustration is compounded by using disparaging comments and insults toward witnesses that lead to all sorts of anti-social site behavior.

It all comes down to this, reading a book of possibilities is far better than arguing with someone who desperately wants to be believed. As for the innocent bystanders of these battles, it takes up more time than I care to deal with so I usually remove myself from the fray.

Read my books, and you'll see what I mean. They're fun, fact based, and full of rich nuggets of information.