La compétence universelle civile, par A. Bucher, professeur honoraire de l'Université de Genève:
La compétence universelle a préoccupé la communauté internationale surtout sous l'angle de la répression pénale. Le droit international n'a guère développé le soutien politique et l'arsenal juridique servant à la protection directe et individuelle des victimes de graves atteintes à leur dignité humaine. On a dit que celles-ci ne disposeraient pas d'un droit de réparation à faire valoir à l'encontre de l'Etat responsable. Ces temps ont changé. En sus de l'indemnisation, les victimes doivent avoir la garantie d'un accès effectif à la justice. C'est une obligation erga omnes à la charge et dans l'intérêt de tous les Etats. Ceux-ci doivent donc assurer qu'il existe un tribunal compétent tout au moins en dernier recours. Si les tribunaux ne peuvent être saisis selon les règles ordinaires, le principe de la compétence universelle oblige tout Etat à accepter l'accès des victimes de telles graves violations des droits de l'homme, quitte à se déclarer compétent à titre subsidiaire seulement s'il existe un for plus approprié et accessible ailleurs.

Limitations on Party Autonomy in International Commercial Arbitration by G. Cordero-Moss, Professor at the University of Oslo:
International commercial contracts often contain a choice of law clause and an arbitration clause. The parties are often convinced that the choice of law clause in the contract excludes that any other country's law is applicable to any aspect of their relationship; even more so when the contract contains an arbitration clause. Arbitration is, as known, based on the will of the parties, and the tribunal is supposed to follow the parties' instructions. Hence, a contract with an arbitration clause apparently enhances the parties' reliance on the choice of law they made in the contract and the disregard of any other laws.
Choice of law clauses are, however, not always capable of fully achieving the results desired by the parties. There are several limits to the effects of these clauses. These limits may depend on the scope of party autonomy, on overriding mandatory rules of other laws or on illegality in the place of performance.
The course intends to show that an arbitration clause does not necessarily prevent the applicability of rules belonging to a law different from the one chosen by the parties: some of these rules cannot be disregarded even by an international arbitral tribunal and, if they are, the award will be invalid or unenforceable.

Intellectual Property: Cross-Border Recognition of Rights and National Development by M. Sinjela, Professor at the University of Lusaka:
Intellectual property is defined as the creation of the human mind, which becomes valuable when reduced into a tangible form. Many view intellectual property as a monopoly. Western countries have used it over the centuries as a tool for wealth creation, while developing countries have thus far not embraced it fully and are unsure of its pivotal role in wealth creation and national development.
To demonstrate the benefits that could accrue to developing countries that embrace intellectual property, the lectures firstly provide a succinct understanding of the entire subject including patents, trademarks, copyright, geographic indication of origin and the protection of new plant varieties. This is intended to give an understanding of the subject that is otherwise little known particularly in developing countries.
The lectures proceed to inform the reader how developing countries that use the i...