Is outsourcing the factor influence wealth inequality?In the first view point factor is such as the extreme inequalities in incomes and assets has been caused to developed and developing both countries. For example, developed countries, e.g. France, Japan, Australia, England etc. developing countries, e.g. China, Hong Kong, Korea, India etc. These countries' employers had paid whose high level of management staff salary is very high and this management level of staff salary will be increased every year. Otherwise, these countries employers also paid whose middle and low both levels staff are very low and these both levels staff whose salary won't be increased very easily every year, even, they will be unemployed if their employers faced financial challenges. Moreover in general, developing or developed countries which governments like to raise salary to the high management level public servant staffs easily. Otherwise, which won't like to raise salary to low or/and middle both levels public servant staffs every year easily. So, it will cause the public servant staff range is very high between the management level public servant staff and the low and middle levels public servant staff and any of these countries' government had done the unfair public servant salary review to treat to their low and middle level staffs in their countries every year for long term. It seems that America's participation to global competition will not influence any one of these countries' wealth inequality directly. So, it seems that the unfair salary review and wealth inequality of treatment issues will be caused to any one country in the world, even the global competition will not be caused, due to America's participation. So, it seems that any country's employers' outsoucing strategy which will influence unfair salary review and it will be one factor to influence the wealth inequality to themselves' employees.In the another view point factor, I also argue the relationship between development countries and gender inequality why which can be explained by the process of development and society-specific factor to cause the wealth inequality by themselves. For example, China and India that have many people are poor today or at least some of them have cultural features that exacerbate favoritism toward males. Being poor is insufficient to explain parent's strong desire to have a son in China and India in custom. In past, the effects of gender inequality can influence economic development to these any of developing countries. More gender inequality causes wealth inequality in these any one of countries, e.g. China, India. In fact, poor countries have no a monopoly on gender inequality. Men earn more than women in essentially all societies. However, disparities in health, education and bargaining power within marriage tend to be larger in countries with low GDP per capita. Moreover, the education gender inequality is also be caused to these poor countries. A negative relationship between the schooling gender gap and GDP is also for primary, secondary and tertiary school enrollment stages. Such as the male student enrollment number is often more than the female student enrollment number of primary, secondary and tertiary schools to these any one of countries, such as China, Korea, India every year. So, these poor countries' male gender graduate students' income and male gender student enrollment number will be higher than the female gender graduate student's income and female gender student enrollment number every year for long term. Due to the high education graduates of the male gender is more than the female gender to these any one of countries every year.