Harley Schlanger: Hello! I'm Harley Schlanger for the Schiller Institute, Welcome to this week's strategic webcast by Helga Zepp-LaRouche, founder of the Schiller Institutes. There's a breaking situation in the United States, Helga, which is really quite astonishing. I think it's worth noting that since the role of the British is now finally coming into focus-the role the British played in setting up the whole operation against the Trump Presidency. Back in November and December 2016, when the operation against Trump was just beginning, you and your husband emphasized that if the operation was going to be stopped, it had to be done by going after the British role, not just in running the operation, but by exposing what was being protected by trying to knock out Trump. I think you have the latest developments on this: Why don't you give us the picture? Helga Zepp-LaRouche: The plot is thickening, as they say. Actually the story is really unbelievable, and I'm quite proud that I wrote an article at the very beginning of this affair, where I said there is collusion with the British and not with Russia-and that is exactly what is now coming out, and it's becoming a subject in the public domain. So, I'll start with the multimillin dollar libel case against Christopher Steele, the allegedly "former" MI6 agent. The case was supposed to be tried in the High Court in London. Steele was supposed to appear for a deposition, but then at the last minute was represented instead by his lawyer, the argument being that this could touch on British national security interests. And, lo and behold, a representative of the Foreign Office was also there, with Foreign Office lawyers, stating the same thing. So the role of the British government, British intelligence, is now a subject in the get-Trump operation. It is quite clear that Christopher Steele is not some random former MI6 agent, but that he is, indeed, an asset not only of the British, but also of the FBI. This point has come out in a very interesting article on Pat Lang's blog, "Sic Semper Tyrannis." A regular, respected contributor to that blog, who posts there under the pseudonym "Publius Tacitus," asks in his headline, "Did British Intelligence Try To Destroy the Trump Presidency?" which is exactly what we are looking at. The host of this blog, Col. Patrick Lang-for most people who don't know him-is a senior retired officer of U.S. Military Intelligence and U.S. Army Special Forces (the Green Berets), not at all some Russian or some other source which might be questioned in this context, but he worked for the Defense Intelligence Agency for a long time, and he's very respected. "Publius Tacitus" points to the fact that the new memos which have come out from Senator Grassley and Senator Graham, and the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee all corroborate what is in the Nunes House Intelligence memorandum. And indeed, there are a lot of new aspects. They imply that maybe former FBI Director James Comey lied under oath, because when he gave the famous press conference exonerating Hillary Clinton, he claimed that he had not coordinated that with anybody else. That is in stark contradiction to some other texts that were exchanged between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, two FBI officials, who were involved in both the email affair of Hillary Clinton and also in Russiagate which indicate that Hillary knew that there would be no charges against her. So, that needs further investigation.