「我們應該成為怎樣的人？」「我們應該怎麼活？」
這個問題有答案嗎？生命的意義有答案嗎？
人類很矛盾，很多老師都說：老師不是聖人，沒有人可以決定別人的人生。
但也有老師說：生命本來就有意義，人本來就應該思考。
「我們應該成為有思考能力的人。」
這件事被說成是「本來」，這是錯誤的，人們無法證明，所以說這是「本來」。
本書將證明：「我們應該成為有思考能力的人。」
本書將證明：「人類有應該走向的未來。」
本書有一個歷史回顧，以前人們害怕思考。
本書的內容就是這三個題目：
「我們應該成為怎樣的人？生命的意義與教育的目的。」
「民主最大的敵人是什麼？生命的意義與威權時代。」
「人類應該走向怎樣的未來？生命的意義與文明的方向。」
Is there an answer to the question:
"What kind of people should we be?" "How should we live ?"
Is there an answer to the meaning of life?
This is a contradiction, many teachers say: teachers are not saints, no one can decide other people's lives.
And some teachers say: Life "originally" has meaning.
"We should become human beings with the ability to think."
This thing is said to be "original", which is wrong, people can't prove it, so it is said to be "original".
This book will prove: "We should become human beings with the ability to think."
This book will prove: "There is a future that humanity should go to."
This book has a historical review, in the past, people were afraid to think.
The contents of this book are:
"What kind of people should we be? The meaning of life and the purpose of education."
"What is the greatest enemy of democracy? The meaning of life and the age of authoritarianism."
"What kind of future should humanity go to? The meaning of life and the direction of civilization."
