At present, striving to accept the whole biblical narrative as truth probably forces many to struggle at reconciling what are considered to be "facts" with faith. What people do not understand is the level at which Lucifer has deceived the whole world (Rev. 12:9). The architects of Luciferian culture have discredited the Genesis Creation narratives so much that people see it as legend, not literal. Now, many feel that it is okay to pick and choose what they want to believe in the rest of the biblical narrative. Comparing the Genesis Creation stories to tropes in pop culture, historical events, and scientific "facts," will create a context to illustrate the absurdity of cosmology so as to validate dome theology: the firmament.
Subsequently, this book presents new arguments that undo conventional opinions that do not recognize the thread which runs through the Abram covenant, the Abrahamic covenant, the Mosaic covenant, and the Davidic covenant. Divine Hebrew Bible covenants have caveats that caused them to build in succession in a way that appears to require a Messiah from outside the human level to resolve them. Establishing that concept creates a context in which to shift the focus away from geography (Land Promises), so that more attention can be paid to theology (redefining Messiahship). So, even though the idea of a Messiah probably did not occur to the prophets, the foremost purpose of this book is to establish why such a character exists in the biblical narrative.
Somehow, the author of the Gospel of Matthew concluded that Jesus, a person who met his Messianic expectations, was in the patriarchal lineage of David and was conceived by the Holy Spirit simultaneously. It seems that the author did this because he was trying to appeal to a Jewish audience. However, "If David thus calls the Messiah Lord, how can the Messiah be David's son?" Thus, the ultimate objective is to determine whose son is the Messiah. A virgin birth, along with a lineage that includes four women, would totally exclude a person from that scenario from being "The Messiah," according to Jewish tradition, because he would have no patriarchal blood ties to the line of David. So, even though it seems that the lineage according to Matthew appears to hurt, not help, Jesus' case for satisfying the traditional requirement for being "The Messiah" (being in the patriarchal lineage of David), it could be that a person came from David's body (loins) without being in his patriarchal lineage (see 2 Sam. 7:16). Therefore, it will be argued how Matthew's lineage, which includes four women, has validity.
Finally, this book presents an original argument that re-imagines the parameters of Messiahship. It will be illustrated why it is difficult, or maybe even impossible, for a Davidic "Messiah" to materialize. Herein, it is illustrated why the authors of Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Zechariah were not aligning their narratives with Davidic Messiahship. An original argument illustrates how there is a Messiah in the biblical storyline that is not in the Davidic line. Instead, he appears to be fully Divine, yet meets Hebrew Bible and New Testament criteria: a person anointed with oil, who holds a high office, who also has the potential to show his purpose at the end of Days. All of this is done in a way that does not violate the Law of Moses.
Hence, the entire purpose of this book is to answer theological questions, not raise them.
