DISTANCE LEARNING LEARNING NEEDAccording, educational program that deliver those skills will bring higher individual economic benefits. Obviously, students who don't better in schools as evidenced by either examination grades or scores on standardized achievement tests tend to go further in school or university. By the same way, the net costs of improvement in school quality if reduction in rates of student repetition study. Then, it brings this question: Will education quality bring future economic return to US? Early some economists' research found that personal and behavioral traits, such as perseverance and leadership qualities had a significant influence upon labor market success, including earnings. To answer above question, we need to know if US schools which generally have good student performance, it will influence socio-economic advantage improved performance, changes in school climate, teacher morale and commitment, school autonomy, teacher-pupil relations and disciplinary had some compensatory influence towards greater equity. In American, pupil socio-economic background and classroom climate appeared to be the most important predictors of achievement. So, it seems human development will influence US economic growth in the future. So, US development organizations seem better will then non-specialized educational organizations to design and deliver effective combinations of livelihoods and literacy.Whether people who attain literacy actually make much use of it is subject to debate. On balance, however, literacy seems more used where economic development is better established. This supports the argument that same degree of economic and political improvement is necessary to sustain literacy. Then, US people will use their literacy skills where conditions make it useful or desirable for them to do so. However, schooling is a social process, and improvements in resources, technology and quality of student and teaching inputs should in principle to able to be enhance its overall quality. In a good number of countries, large increases in average real expenditure per student and other measures of school resources in primary and secondary schools over the last four or five decades have not remotely been matched by a comparable increase in average test scores.What can be influenced from quality of education to US? Some economists suggest the earning can provide an important incentive mechanism, which can influence both the quality and motivation of teachers. If teachers' real average earnings had kept the same level with other professional groups over the period, the productivity impact of their earnings growth would literacy have been small. The first view point, in fact, however, in many countries teachers' earnings have increased considerably less sharply than those other groups. Teachers may feel worse off, because of their decline in status relative to other professional groups. This circumstance could well explain part perhaps an important part of the apparent lack of impact on learning outcomes of increase in real per student spending over time. One to teachers' general salary is low to compare other professional in the global society.Then, it brings this question. Can quantity of education influence US economic growth?