In this book, the alleged vaccination delusion is considered: this allegation of a vaccination delusion in our culture has been with us since the start of the >200 year practice, it has been maintained by an unbroken line of highly credentialed scientists in the relative fields; the continuous point of contention is that the alleged lifesaving value of vaccination is non-existent despite the majority of us thinking it exists. Suggesting vaccination can't save lives, is almost always mistaken for a suggestion that we have been lied to by someone somehow, as if it's impossible to be deluded thus, on such a large scale. Conspiracy theorists can all be pooled into the one group: they don't trust the written word of the government, the institutions, they wouldn't trust a controlled vaccination trial report that showed an observable impact on the mortality rate, thus they basically are negligible in debate. But precisely how can we unite these two non-conspiratorial thinking groups, of believers and non-believers? I believe the key to this is controlled experimental evidence, which gives us unassailable indications. If we have a product that allegedly saves lives, and we can't demonstrate it in our faces, we need to arrange a large numbered well-controlled trial.How might we record an unseeable phenomenon: i.e. that which we convince ourselves exists but which for all we know might not? One way to do this is to arrange circumstances in such a way that the effect of the hypothesised phenomenon, if it exists, will most-definitely be pronounced and observable. This is a scientific approach. When it comes to the claimed life-saving effect of vaccination, what circumstances have we arranged, and what phenomena has been pronounced/observed?It seems not one controlled experiment can be found that has produced an observable lifesaving effect for vaccination (nor even a lowering of disease incidence). It seems this kind of evidence has been demanded all along the >200-year escapade. How, then, have we satisfied ourselves that such a lifesaving effect really does exist for vaccination? Chapter 2 'Demonstrating the Benefit' includes an analysis of the most famous of all controlled vaccination trials/experiments, the '54 Salk Polio Vaccine trial, and many more controlled trials, from quite recent.The most prominent historical figures that maintained this allegation of the vaccination delusion, to me, are Alfred Wallace and Charles Creighton, and yet none of the experts who educate Joe Rogan on the history of the vaccination debate appear to know these two men existed, leaving Joe to think that the crux of the >200 years long vaccination debate is a conspiracy theory, which has always been wrong, as you can see from reading the work of these two men, on vaccination, in their day.I consider myself someone who had enough time and resources to analyse the vaccination debate thoroughly and refine it into a book for the scientific culture, on the chance that in effect, our community will grow more consolidated in its view on disease genesis and mitigation: in the hope that the only nae-sayers will be conspiracy theorists, rather than university-educated adults claiming we haven't got enough controlled experimental evidence to convince them. I want a happier community and I believe squashing out long-standing debates is good work. If someone is going to finish this debate off (leaving it to the conspiracy theorists only), it won't be because they attained a PhD and also happened to not believe, the equivalent to this has been happening since Edward Jenner convinced the British Military of the lifesaving power of vaccination.Included are analyses of the most prestigious examples of claimed triumph such as Polio and Smallpox, whilst steering clear of any kind of conspiratorial thinking, analysing the official track record.